Thursday, February 26, 2009

DUI and the Dump Bucket


Not a PSA, just good think'n...

January 29th, I had the extreme fortune of attending Empson's Barolo and Brunello Tour held at Kaspar's in Seattle.  This was a trade show/tasting put on by the importer Empson for wine shops, restaurants and stores.  Over a hundered wines from Piedmont and Tuscany were present.  My being there came way of a generous invite from Dan Carr (owner/chef) of Visconti's Italian Restaurant in Leavenworth.  He couldn't make it.  He was to attend a three-day class in Woodinville, learning how to breakdown a Mangalitsa pig.  He asked if I would act as his buyer.  Wow. Instant pressure.  But the need for he and his chef Randy to begin prepping for "our" pig dismantling (for the upcoming March dinner) was all too important.  I accepted the assignment.  I took my post.

Having spent time on both sides of the tasting room counter, I've grown to appreciate the accumulative effects of those "little sample pours".  When I've worked bigger regional events (with tons of wines poured), I've witnessed patrons at the end of the day looking, well... let's say (in nicest terms) hammered!  

I saw something at the Empson show that I would like to share with you.  A simple idea.  And it cries out from a comment made to me years ago by a French winemaker.  "We don't taste with our stomachs".  

I saw dump buckets.  

No, not the little flowery vase things one envisions at your run-of-the-mill tasting room, but bona fied three gallon pails... galvanized with heavy gauge wire handles.  And, here's the unsettling part... people were spitting into them.  Yes, bent at the waist as if to expel toothpaste from the groggy morning ritual.  Women carefully holding their hair back with head slightly turned to one side, as if to suggest that class and grace have always been partners in this custom. Glorious wine, spat right out for all to see.  The soundtrack was a cacophony of swooshes and splatters echoing throughout the room evoking the ill-aimed filling of nursing home bedpans.  A shame?  Of course!  Knowing that these wines were from some of the region's top producers, was nerve racking.  Then it occurred to me... hey, this was "trade".  This was expected.  Executed right in front of my eyes was the code of professional conduct.  Not to let the effects of alcohol cloud one's perceptions.  Clear-headed for the buying decisions one would make, amounting in thousands of dollars being spent.  It was all so normal.  It was a first-time for me, but soon it felt right.  Felt smart.  I didn't consume until my very last two ounce sample.  And it tasted like heaven.  It tasted earned.  2003 Poggio Antico Brunello di Montalcino "Riserva" it was.  I will remember you always... (insert childish whimper).

Okay, about now you'd be within your right to ask "...and your point is?".  The point is to tackle the stigma of spitting.  At bigger events, I think there's no question.  Taste Washington, Woodinville Wine Passport, Walla Walla's Spring Release weekend, you name it, at events of this size we all should.  But rarely one does.  There's a value-driven rationale of "Hey, I got charged to get in here, hell ya, I'm drinking!"  Oh, I've been there, so have many of you.  Five dollar tasting fee?!  More reason to throw back.

From these events (including day trip winery tours), you eventually have to get home. Drive home. Drive with maybe, oh... just a hair over .08 in the system?  Not hard to do.  With regret, I've done this and so have many of you.  Not proud of it.  Just being honest for a moment.  At forty-six, I've lived long enough to have seen a couple of friends, friends of friends and the like get a DUI.  With all its public-safety flag waving, the DUI citation has become a portal into a revenue-collecting industry.  A legal spider's web of court dates, loss of privileges, fines, fees, incarceration, mandatory attendance at a faith-based support group (thinly-veiled as a recovery program) at which you will be bullied into recanting your sobriety and, of course, a heavy dose of puritanical guilt thrown in for good measure.  On the moral side of this issue, someone can die.  And many have.  No, I've never received a DUI.  Just been a good (horrified) listener to those who have.

Preventable?  Sure.  Spit!  We all should be asking at each winery and event if we can do so.  
For the record, I'm no prude.  I'm not suggesting a campaign of buzz-kill mania.  One of my favorite things on this planet (okay, second favorite) is that red wine "glow".  That euphoria just before "buzzed" commandeers your forebrain.  The state of mind my friend Johnny P. describes as "being right with the world".  But for some of us, there's less distinction between "glow" and "buzz".  Fewer warning signs that we're several "little sample pours" past good sense.  Almost as if someone maliciously removed the safety-yellow floor striping cautioning our step at the edge of the abyss.  The abyss of reckless endangerment, of charges and shame, of fines and fees, of twelve-step programs.  The abyss of fatally injuring someone.

Folks, I encourage you to consider the art of spitting.
Ask for it by name.

Take care,

David





Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Visconti's Winemaker's Dinner Menu


Napeequa Vintners at Visconti's in Leavenworth, WA March 7th (6 PM roll call)
For reservations, call 509-548-1213  
Price: $85 per person (+tax/gratuity)

Reception   -   Bisol Prosecco 


Antipasti 

Smoked Pork Shank with Borlotti Soup 

(Puree of Borlotti  Beans with Smoked Pork Shank) 

Pork Pate Campania 

(Bacon wrapped Italian Country Style Pork Pate)

Insalata Radicchio 

(Applewood grilled Radicchio, hot Pancetta Bacon Dressing, Cracklings) 

Napeequa Randonee, Yakima Valley, 2006 


Primi 

Tre Belisimo Prosciutto 

(Three Preservation Methods of Italian Prosciutto) 

Pancetta Wrapped Prawns with Aioli 

(Wild Mexican Gulf Shrimp Wrapped with House-made Pancetta Bacon) 

Crostini con Pork Rillettes 

(Slow Poached Savory Pork Spread on Crostini) 

Napeequa Trillium Rose, Columbia Valley  2007 


Secondi 

Cotecchino con Lentils 

(Poor man's Banquet, Large Cotecchino Sausage with Stewed  Lentils) 

Stinco of Pork on Grilled Polenta 

(Braised Pork Shank over Wedge of Rustic Polenta) 

Grilled Eggplant with Pork Ragu 

(Grilled Round of Eggplant Stuffed with Pork Bolognese) 

Napeequa Malbec, Columbia Valley  2006 


Finale 

Porcini Mushroom Risotto with Braised Pork Belly and Poached Pork Tenderloin 

(Heritage Pork Belly braised in Stock and Poached Pork Tenderloin Scallops  on Porcini Mushroom Risotto) 

Napeequa Trailhead, Maverick Saddle Edition, Columbia Valley  2006 


Dolce 

Chocolates by Schocolat 

Napeequa Arete, Yakima Valley Port  2005 

Napeequa Gewurtztraminer Ice Wine, Yakima Valley  2007

Thursday, February 5, 2009

If Only We Could...


State of Washington plans to build more liquor stores.  Do you care?

Well, when this very story ran in the Seattle Times two weeks ago, plenty of you did.
The objection (oddly enough) was not that the State needed to raise more money to cover a gaping shortfall, it was that folks were really re-visiting the nasty notion that the State is in the hard booze business... alone.  The hypocrisy here is that the State, for decades, has played the "control of consumption" card to protect all of us from the evils of over-indulgence. Then they announce plans to bring more liquor to the people.  More booze bought by more people equals more money.  I'm no economics major here, but I'm getting the idea that the State would like to sell more alcohol.  Which brings me to this next terrible idea...

Think of this for a second, what if you could only buy a car at a state-controlled car dealership?
State-ran grocery store?  What if Home Depot or Lowes were operated by the State.  Think of yourself wanting to start a business selling home improvement supplies, lumber, tools and lawn and garden equipment and being told "No!".  You couldn't enter that business because the State had a monopoly on it.  A monopoly.  That's right, the same practice that gets Microsoft in trouble and hauled off to court every other week.

How does Washington remain in this position of control when in other states you and I can walk into a Walgreens, Safeway or Costco and buy a bottle of whiskey or rum?  The practice excludes private enterprise.  How is this allowed?  To my knowledge, Indian tribes can sell hard liquor from stores that resemble convenience stores.  So they can run them but, non-tribal... forget it.  I'd like someone to fill me in on how we got here and why this practice is tolerated.  

The picture above is from a grandfatherly gentleman I met at a winery in New Zealand in the late eighties.  As you can see, he's self-serving his jug.     
A far cry from what I've discussed above.
To fill your own bottle of wine, beer or whiskey from a vat or cask and go home... if only we could.